Amodini's Book Reviews

Book Reviews and Recommendations

Tweaking reality, MTV style – Part 2

Written By: amodini - May• 18•09

Note : This is Part 2 of a series, Part 1 is here.

Roadies has become one of the most popular reality shows on Indian television, and with good reason. I think it’s because they were so raw and real and un-tweaked. They don’t have the artifice or the artificial judges, or the make-overs, or the artificial build-ups. Folks on the show didn’t exude that artificialness that too much scripting brings. There is in-built humor and lots of tomfoolery, but that’s pretty natural since it’s the cast and crew being who they are. And people love genuine stuff ( hint-hint : it’s a reality show)

However with this season (Season 6 – Hell down under), there has been a change. It hasn’t been as engrossing as previous seasons, and it appears that Roadies might be losing it’s shine. The show has, in it’s need to be newer and better and bigger, veered from being mostly un-tweaked to constantly needing prodding – either in the form of some very convoluted mind machinations or in the super-new avatars of Raghu (and his twin Rajiv) as the new bad men of television. And it doesn’t do anyone any good.

The longest running reality show on MTV, and a relative hit at that, it is being milked dry – you have the Season itself, you have the Awards, and then you have the Roadies Cheat Code. And now you actually have Raghu advertising Roadies merchandise at Archies Galleries. New advertisements feature current or ex-roadies in action either in the show itself or at the auditions.

The Roadies Auditions have always been an essential part of the Season, and very entertaining to watch. You have the youth of the city, and it might be a metro like Delhi or Bombay, turn up to try and become Roadies. It is fascinating to watch these humongous amounts of people vying to impress the Audition judges – as though Roadies was the ultimate dream.

MTV does a fairly thorough job – they have questionnaires, group discussions, and face-to-face interviews. And they hand-pick an interesting bunch of people. Now with past seasons, the participants have been characters (and I mean that in the nicest possible way) but they have also had ability or some outstandingly “good” quality. They seem to have had that caliber. They made the grade.

With the previous two seasons, I notice that the caliber level is going down. The participants get picked chiefly because they are “characters” rather than worthy competitors. With Season 5, when Ashutosh won, his competitiors were mostly big-city kids who lacked the tact and the basic level-headedness that Ashutosh had. Still the “positive” characters numbered more than the “negative” ones. And the negative characters got eliminated one-by-one. And the decent ones stayed on. And then Ashutosh won. Everyone happy – see ?

With the recently ended season (Season 6), Nauman won. And while he was a relatively worthy contender and deserved to win, this season the negative characters outnumbered the positive ones. Not only did they fail when it cam to matters of physical ability (notice how this set of Roadies did badly on many tasks) they also lacked spirit – that rah-rahing roaring of I-can-do-ness that would be expected from participants of this kind of a show.

Next : Dissecting Roadies Season 6

Tweaking reality, MTV style – Part 1

Written By: amodini - May• 12•09

The Mtv Roadies Theme (Feat. Raghu)Reality TV has never been bigger. From the now famous Survivor and Big Boss (both the desi and the British versions where Shilpa Shetty made big news) to the talent shows like American Idol and “Britain’s got talent” all rely on the elimination principle. Here’s a bunch of willing participants subject to certain tasks, and very certain judgement – by a set of official judges or their own select set of peers, or it could even be the aam junta (hence the popularity of the call in/text/vote for me phenomena). Many versions of these have trickled down to Indian television also. Thus you have the Indian version of “Big Boss”, “Indian Idol” and MTV Roadies, not to mention the hundreds of inferior cousins that this trend has spawned.

It’s basic emotions here, because people are people – they react. And apparently watching people react is pretty interesting, because these shows have high ratings. As such these shows are many, and each episode is dragged out for maximum effect. They are also sometimes tweaked to get the drama going. So you have the planned walk-off, or the stylized protest – something patently false being presented as “reality”. However, and besides all that, you want the show to be “strong” i.e.; viewers feel for it, because that is when they will watch it. And you want the “good” people to win, else it may not be a show people want to watch anymore.

I follow MTV Roadies with great interest, since as mentioned before, it is fairly good for the soul to watch people being stupid at 18, having passed aforementioned age myself. Not that stupidity ceases to affect one now – no indeed, it can and does cross all racial, cultural and age barriers – but still. And right from Season 1, it seemed like this Show had it all right. A great set of characters – yeah, they might not think things through, but teenagers and folks in their early twentys do tend to have a lot more energy and earnestness. And a reasonably zany director in Raghu, who’s gotten kookier with time, but more on that later. And a fair-minded anchor. Ranvijay won the first season, and got picked up by MTV as the Roadies anchor. He looks like he’s got his head screwed on right, besides being athletic and a Roadie winner himself.

So the motley crew and the participants hit the road, travel across the country doing pretty interesting physical/mental/creative tasks. And it gets you hooked you know, because of the people. Some of them are nice and some of them are not so nice. They have their own quirks, and they react differently to different situations – it could be a stressful task, a fight, or just plain speaking your mind. And through the journey, and the passing of the days and the episodes, you come to know them quite well. And you know whom you back.

Thus you have: a following.

And then you have : popularity.

Note : This is Part 1 of a series, Part 2 here.

Mother’s Day 2009

Written By: amodini - May• 12•09

Another Mother’s Day has passed. And this time along with beautiful handmade cards I actually got thoughtful store-bought gifts 🙂 . And lots of hugs and kisses. And promises of foot massages when “Mom” got tired (oh, their tiny hands !).

I’ve a lot to be Thankful for.

It’s a little late, but to all you Mothers, joy, happiness, peace and serenity !

Kids being cool

Written By: amodini - Apr• 17•09

We’re driving along after school one day, and a nice desi song plays on the CD player. My son starts to hum along with it, offending his sister who would rather listen to the original. After several attempts to quiten him down, she finally hits upon a novel idea. Here is how it goes :

She : Do you want to be a part of my club ?

He :
Which club ?

She :
Its called MSBKQ.

Mom (that’s me) : What does that mean ?

She : First you have to tell me whether you’re in or not.

Mom :
I’m not. Not if I don’t know what it is.

He :
I agree with Mom. I’m not in either.

And while I drive along placidly, I can see him in the rear view mirror seething with curiosity. Finally :

He : OK – I’m in. Now what is it ?

She : It is “Make Stupid Brother Keep Quiet”

He : MOM ! She called me Stupid.

Mom : Hey ! You can’t call him stupid.

He :
She’s mean !

Mom : OK, OK, why don’t we make it MSSKQ – Make Silly Sibling Keep Quiet ? Then, she’s silly too.

He nods. And she, now relenting, agrees.

She : So now since you’re a part of the club, you have to be quiet.

I agree. Silence reigns. He, outfoxed, doesn’t know it. I see her smile.

After a while :

Mom : Want to be a part of my club ? It’s called BC.

He : I’m in. It’s Be Cool, isn’t it ?

Mom : Yes, unless you’re Ekta Kapoor – then it’s BK – Be Kkkkkool !

She : Who’s Ekta Kapoor ? And why does she talk funny ?

Obama, Michelle and Bo

Written By: amodini - Apr• 16•09

What with the Barack Obama’s many appearance on TV shows, Michelle Obama’s fashion news, and now Bo the White House Dog’s recent appearance on the White House Lawn, it seems that the White House and it’s inhabitants are always in the news. I’m a little worried that Obama is turning out to be quite a showman. The news networks aren’t sparing him either – should the President be doing more important stuff ?

boHowever is it really worrying ? After all the President is the ultimate cheer-leader. Would you rather have him mooning about the White House in a blue funk while the economy is in a slump ? The present financial crisis, such as it is, is a many-headed beast – i.e.; no one really has a definite solution. They do what they think is best, and there’s lots of pork in there too.

One must remember that Obama’s job is probably the hardest there is – how to keep your chin up. It does help that he is such a fine orator, but the pressure in undoubtably enormous. Some want baliouts, some don’t ,some want money spent, some don’t, but in the end, guess who’s getting the blame ? So when people tell me that they are worried that Obama is getting too much TV time, I say lighten up, give the man a break. If that’s all that you can find to criticize about him, he must really be doing his job.

Test post by email

Written By: amodini - Apr• 16•09

Test post by email
————————
Amodini's Movie Reviews
————————
http://hindimoviereviews.blogspot.com
—————————————
Hindi Movie Reviews by genre, rating and year

Review : The girl with the dragon tattoo

Written By: amodini - Apr• 01•09

dragon“The girl with the dragon tattoo” has been high on the best-seller lists, and I am not quite sure why. The book was written by Stieg Larsson, a Swedish journalist. Larsson died in 2004. The book was published in 2005, and in English, is a translation of the original.

The 2 pronged premise is intriguing enough. The first thread is about Mikael “Kalle” Blomkvist, a financial journalist, who is sued by a corrupt industrialist Wennerstrom who’m he has attempted to expose. Blomkvist loses the case, and his life and career hang in the balance. The second story involves Henrik Vanger , another influential industrialist, who is investigating the disappearance of his 16 year old niece Harriet. Harriet disappeared nearly 40 years ago, but Henrik has never given up on the search. What has further fuelled his search is the fact that he receives a pressed flower every year on his birthday, something that Harriet used to gift him. And if Harriet is dead, who is reminding him of her every year ?

Henrik hires Blomkvist, who to all appearances is taking a break to recuperate from the recent blow to his career and reputation, to investigate Harriet’s disappearance. Initially unwilling, Blomkvist agrees to the request when Henrik promises him evidence against Wennerstrom, at the end of the agreed year. Henrik lives on an island owned by the wealthy Vanger family, surrounded by his relatives, most of whom he detests. Blomqvist moves to the island on the pretext of writing Henrik’s biography, although the Vanger clan is not fooled. And then he along with Lisbeth Salander, a social rebel and astute investigator, forage around for clues to a long cold case.

While the core Vanger clan investigation was interesting to follow, and the novel did pick up speed when the author was delineating this part, most of the book reads like a not-too-adept translation. I found the structure jerky, with the essential fluidity of a mystery novel missing. Larsson is given to providing details of unimportant objects and events, like describing details of the computer/camera that Salander is using or the size of the room that Henrik uses as his office. It would have sufficed to use relative adjectives like “large” or “cutting edge” rather than describe products by brand name – that is a little weird and distracting.

The characters in the book didn’t seem real enough, because although they did things we never got to know why they did them, or what they thought. The action described in third person seems detached, and makes it hard to sympathize with the main protagonists. Also, and I seem to harp about this, a lot of things appeared to be “lost in translation”. Take Blomkvist’s casual attitude to his relationships – he is apparently in one with a married woman (who’s husband is OK with her affair-on-the-side) , but has no qualms with falling into bed with other women – now is that just him, or is it a Swedish thing ? We never know.

Note that I’m not objecting to his “morality”, I’m just asking for a better understanding of his character. If he is such a good guy (and he is) why is he such a good guy ? And if he is such a charming guy that women are simply hopping into his bed (almost) unasked, can we have a better description of him, other than the title of the book he is reading ? Blomkvist was very “active” in the story, but seemed “passive“. His actions were described with detachment, and seemed remote, and I never got a whiff of the passionate murder mystery the reviews had promised.

Salander is the girl in the title. Why I have no idea, because she is not the main character here – Blomkvist is. She has numerous tattoos (besides the dragon one), is almost an orphan (her mother is an asylum of some sort), and has some serious issues with fitting into “normal” society. She is thus a ward of the state, and is required to report to a state-appointed guardian. At 24, she is an accomplished computer hacker, and is at home with numerous state-of-the-art “snooping” gadgets.

The original Swedish book was named “Men who hate women” which probably suited it better, given the whole violence theme in the book. Misogynists abound in the story, and there are graphic descriptions of sexual and other violence in the book. Each chapter is prefaced with statistics on abuse against women.

I dragged my feet on this book, very painfully getting to the end. The stilted style, and the fact that the book continues on for about a hundred pages, after the climax, to a pretty lame ending, put me off. On the whole, I found the book cliché-ridden and badly edited (I would have lopped off a whole lot of useless exposition), and left me thinking that the actions in the book need to be grounded in more context.

Bizarre Bollywood video courtesy Israel

Written By: amodini - Mar• 31•09

I hadn’t see this when the rest of the world reported it, but here is what Stratpost says about it :

” . . .another measure of this eagerness to do business with India is also the innovative video marketing which an Israeli arms company, Rafael displayed on large screen televisions at their stall at Aero India 2009 recently.

The video is a Bollywood-style dance number featuring Israeli artists in full Bollywood costume singing in English about the potential for the Indo-Israeli defense trade relationship and dancing around mock-ups of Rafael’s products. It is significant that recent reports have indicated Israel to have overtaken Russia as India’s single-largest defense materiel supplier.”

The video itself is not only tacky, and of terrible production values (hopefully they don’y produce missiles the way they do Bollywood videos) but the lyrics are a treasure :

She (presumably India) : I need to feel safe and sheltered. . . I believe in you
He (presumably strong Israel) : I promise to defend you,
fulfil your expectations ,
sheild you and support you,
meet my obligations . . .
Both : Together and forever, I will hold you in my heart,
Together and forever, we will never be apart . . .
we will always beeeee . . .

Maybe Farhan Akhtar could hire these guys to write lyrics for his upcoming films, new talent and all that, you know ?

And here is the awful video itself – wait for the part when they go “Dinga dinga dee” – the Govinda influence, no ? 🙂

[youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ktQOLO4U5iQ]

“Inspired” films – Ugly aur pagli

Written By: amodini - Mar• 24•09

Ugly Aur Pagli - 2008 ( Dvd )If you haven’t seen “Ugly aur pagli”, read this review, and avoid it like the plague. I’m a glutton for punishment , I think, or an eternal optimist – depends upon your point of view. Because I rented the American version of “My Sassy Girl”. And really it isn’t any better watching existential angst, or whatever it is they are trying to project, in Americanese.

I haven’t seen the original Korean version yet, although, knowing me, I’ll probably see it before long. “Ugly aur pagli” is based upon that original Korean version, and while people gad about appreciating it, the Indian-ised version, aka U & P must be the most grotesque translation of it ever. The story is essentially a romance – between a sadist/control freak and a guy who believes that there is goodness everywhere. So she uses him as a punching bag, and he lets her. Kind of painful to watch really, because the guy is so good, you want to go in there and intervene on his behalf. Anyway, lots of tremulous tears later, we discern that there is probably some deep sorrow that the female is suffering from, because really people aren’t this nasty in their natural avatars, no ? And then the clincher, she decides to break it off – for an year. Reasons known only to her. He of course, agrees – what to do ? He’s in love, you see.

OK, so the Indian version, U & P has been situated in Bombay and stars Mallika and Ranvir. Both fall flat chemistry wise, and while “My Sassy Girl” stars Jesse Bradford who’s cute, and looks like a chocolate hero with brains (and a heart), Ranvir is not Mc-Dreamy in the least (apologies Ranvir, nothing personal – you are a great actor though). I mean, throw the (Indian) women a bone, people ! And Mallika’s acting skills = 0. So, while Elisha Cuthbert (she plays Keifer Sutherland’s daughter in “24”) gets all teary-eyed and vulnerable, Mallika just looks she’s out to punish all man-kind (and I mean that literally) by making them wear stilettos.

And while I like romances generally (I mean , you know, who doesn’t , except the Shiv Sena, and Shri Ram Sene, that is ?) I don’t get the whole suffering bit. Like why make a movie about torture and call it a love story ? Just say it like it is, you know and leave the innocent public alone. You see what I mean ?

There are adaptations and then there are adaptations. And life pays you back. For every entertaining Pyar ke side-effects, there is one terrible U & P. And you do end up watching it – and the angrezi version.

I am now wary of any romance that needs you to look beyond the obvious – too much work for a Friday night, when you’re all petered out from the week’s grind. Too much work otherwise too. Mindless TV anyone ?

Celebrity Apprentice = Boring

Written By: amodini - Mar• 15•09

The Apprentice - The Complete First SeasonThere used to be a time when I used to look forward to “Apprentice”. It was interesting and it featured normal people who actually wanted the opportunity to work for Donald Trump. Now Apprentice has morphed into “Celebrity Apprentice”. It is essentially the same show but now instead of featuring folks who want to be there, it has “celebrities”. What is the point ? Who’s bad idea was this ? Celebrities don’t need jobs, and they have no interest to go work for Trump. Because guess what – they actually have careers, and successful ones – because, duh ! they are celebrities.