Amodini's Book Reviews

Book Reviews and Recommendations

MTV Roadies – The Show

Written By: amodini - Feb• 07•08

I don’t watch many reality shows. However one that really has me hooked is “MTV Roadies”. I’ve heard that it was originally inspired from a US show of similar genre, but definitely adapts (and makes excellent TV viewing) to the desi climate. It’s in it’s fifth season, and comprises of 13 youngsters (18-22 from the looks of it), 6 of whom are girls. All the roadies are equipped with Hero Honda bikes, and traverse India (and internationally this season) on them, in a space of 40 days. In this time, they are subjected to various challenges to gain “immunity” and prevent “vote-outs”. The one who survives till the end, wins.

The show itself is interesting, but way more interesting are the auditions. The auditions are held in many cities – Jaipur, Delhi, Bombay etc. I haven’t seen them held in Chennai or Hyderabad, or Bangalore (anyone know why ?). Sieved through group discussions, the hopefuls are interviewed one-on-one by judges Raghu Ram (also the show’s producer) and Nikhil Chinappa. And it’s amazing to see the large numbers that turn up, from vernacular-speaking folks from Saharanpur (he got in) to wannabe-popstars from Bombay (like Ambili – kind of surprised she wasn’t selected, seemed like she’d have revved things up).

Aspirants turn up dressed to appear as “cool” as possible; I’ve yet to see a female in a salwar-kameez. However there are women in shorts, and guys in muscle tees, and the ubiquitous jeans. The American flag is on many chests (Indian flag not “cool” ?). The “normal” ones don’t make the cut, since as Nikhil puts it, they aren’t looking for fastest, fittest, or strongest, they’re looking for characters. So, off-the-wall people welcome. Also chauvinists. Also people who seem really messed up in the head (how come there aren’t more of those 🙂 ?). And attention-seekers. And folks who wannabe famous (lots of them from the look of it).

While I do envy Raghu and Nikhil (they seem to be having a grilling-good time), it does not surprise me at all, from my cushy, vantage point of 10+ years over most of the kids, how dumb most kids are at that age. I was too. I’m sure some of it still persists.

It’s probably the time to act “cool” and use the f-word (thinking it’s cool) and to appear to want to cheat, and lie, and want to one-up the other. That probably explains the answers the interviewees write in their Quiz sheet. The judges who are both in their 30s have it relatively easy. All they need is hind-sight (always 20-20). Recall “how dumb was I then ?”. These poor sods are probably just like me. Begin grilling. Admittedly though, Raghu has more than his fair share of virtual diplomas in pop-psychology.

Of hem-lines and court-cases

Written By: amodini - Feb• 05•08

Hot off yesterday’s presses (the television channels had a field day speculating) news of Sania Mirza’s decision to not play in the Bangalore Open. Sania, who’s only 21, has had a lot of “flak” from everyone who has a mouth, camera and media access, apparently. Her clothes are indecent, not covering her sufficiently, say fundie Muslims.

Haseeb-ul-hasan Siddiqui, a leading cleric of the Muslim organisation the Sunni Ulema Board, said: “The dress she wears on the tennis courts not only doesn’t cover large parts of her body but leaves nothing to the imagination.”

Imagination is imagination. And it is subjective. If you aren’t looking at her as a tennis player (that’s why she’s there in the first place), but as an object for titillation, then it’s entirely your choice. Yes, she has legs, which we can see in this case. And she has arms, peeking out of her sleeves. And she has hips, and a chest and other essential biological paraphernalia. But so does every other woman. Just because she steps out on court, must she be dissected so ?

As an aside, women are dissected, everyday, on the street, whatever they wear. This is politely called eve-teasing, but is in reality, sexual molestation. Commenting publicly on Sania’s attire, however takes this to a whole new level. What exactly does a young woman perceive if a public, religious body, can comment on another’s mode of dress and get away with it ? How must a woman perceive her mode of dress ? Always subject to criticism ? Always objectified ? Always a vessel of titillation ? How does a girl grow up free and un-fettered under such scrutiny ?

Must she play in purdah now ? (There goes her World No. 29 slot). Then she was misquoted on her views on pre-marital sex. She’s 21, an adult, and possess a brain. Hence she can have an opinion. But the fundies will have none of it. I say, who cares ? Why can’t she have an opinion ? And even if she believes in pre-marital sex (and she said she didn’t, but that’s another story), so what ?

Then, some innovative photographer photographed her from a curious angle, where it looked like she was pointing at an Indian flag with her feet. Due to this accidental pose, “Mirza faces a possible prosecution under the Prevention of Insult to the National Honour Act. “ I mean, poor kid. All she wants to do is to play tennis. But since she’s a woman, she must please all the religious fundamentalists in India, sit and behave like a woman should, not speak her mind, and whet her appearance and advertisement schedules to make sure there’s not a mosque or a flag in the vicinity.

This is a lovely advertisement for Incredible India, if the travel advisories against female travelers to India, were not enough. It is interesting to note that the Ulemas aren’t picking on Muslim women in the Bollywood industry who wear smallish clothes. Why Sania ? Why not Katrina Kaif, or Malaika Arora Khan ? I’m not advocating that they should, but why issue such statements against a girl barely out of her teens, who’s clothing is incidental to her bread-and-butter ? It brings up the specter of the “perceived” corruption of the actress. Katrina, beyond redemption, let’s not try to reform her ? Sania, poor kid, can still be rescued from descending into hell, by covering up those shameful legs ?

Yes, religious freedom is a necessity, but who decides when religious ideology impinges on the rights of a person ? When can the state rise up and protect the rights of a citizen (say Sania) and “gag” a person/body/association making subjective accusations on a person’s personal choices ? Sania understandably isn’t wanting to ruffle any more feathers.

Sania hasn’t attempted to thwart Muslim ideology in an obvious way, but she doesn’t fit into the role of traditional, good girl. Hence the nit-picking. I imagine it’s a whole lot of un-needed pressure being subjected to such accusations, and court cases, without doing anything to invite them. And I can see why she wouldn’t want to go out there and have it all happen again.

Miss America Reality Check

Written By: amodini - Jan• 24•08

Recently caught an episode of the “Miss America Reality Check” on TLC. The show started Jan 4th. and according to TLC, does the following : “TLC has announced Miss America: Reality Check, a four-part reality special that will follow 52 beauty queens as they prepare to compete in the 2008 Miss America Pageant, will premiere on Friday, January 4 at 10PM ET/PT.”

It, like all reality shows goes for the drama. The girls seem spirited enough, but there are no fights, arguments etc. – am guessing the girls are way too conscious of the image they project on TV, especially when the crown has yet to be won. However, if the aim is to actually choose a girl with beauty, intelligence and spine, this show goes against the grain.

Firstly, I thought the anchors and the judges were way too condescending, kind of like if these are Miss America contestants, they must lack in the brain department. The show does not applaud women who make their own decisions. You must go with their flow, or get picked upon. After a trivia contest, in the last episode, the winners were offered make-overs. One girl refused, saying that she did not wish to shorten her hair. OK, good, her hair, her decision, right ? What’s with the reminding her that she gave up a golden opportunity, or that she was the only one who was refusing the make-over ? Yes, I know you want to go for the kill, but a little grace, please ? You want one of these women to represent America, yes ?

And the anchor, Hurie : annoying, annoying, annoying !

Subtle images of disempowerment

Written By: amodini - Jan• 21•08

NDTV has been advertising the advent of it’s new channel NDTV Imagine, which starts Jan 21st. One of the advertisements is for the soap “Radha ki betyaan kuch kar dikhayengi”. From the web “Radha Ki Betiyaan is the story of a proud mother who instils the right values in her daughters and believes in their potential for excellence in whatever they choose to do”. Shailaja Kejriwal, the channel’s executive vice-president says of it “”Radha Ki Betiyaan Kuch Kar Dikhayenge is about a mom, Supriya Pilgoankar, whose daughters aim to do something more with their lives than simply find suitable bridegrooms.” Sounds lovely. Nice and empowering. However the ad. doesn’t reflect the “empowerment” part.

In the ad., we see Radha and her three daughters, Radha in a whitish sari, not much make-up and a bindi. They stand together, and behind them appears a city, presumably where they live. That’s Image 1 that registers. OK, so Radha – probably single/widowed, yes ? Bringing up three daughters. Daughters, as seen in the ad. – smart, nice women (they smile a lot). Then image 2 : We see all of them, coming up, one by one, and putting money into a piggy-bank.

Note, that these are women, grown-up women (except maybe the youngest kid), saving money, by putting it into a piggy-bank. How do you view a piggy-bank ? How much money can you be putting into a piggy-bank ? When you do need money from that piggy-bank, how much will you have in it ? Hundreds of rupees ? Less ?

I haven’t yet seen a man on television save money by putting paise into a piggy-bank. OK, not unless he’s like two. Why not ? Because this implies :

1. You don’t have much money (piggy-bank good enough for a few coins, yes ?)
2. You don’t have enough to use a real bank (like SBI, Citi etc.).
3. You are either homely, or a loser
4. You have constrained circumstances
5. You aren’t fighting your battles out with the big dogs.

Let’s take the gist of that : no money, not enough, homely, constrained circumstances, not fighting it out in the real world, and associate all that with women. It’s pretty negative, except for the “homely” part. Being “homely” has come to have negative connotations, because a homely women, is portrayed as relinquishing her right to independence, with her only usefulness being in the kitchen/home etc.

I think this, that women save what little they have by putting it into home-grown piggy-banks, in an age of technology, email and real, convenient-to-use banking, is a subtle image of disempowerment. It’s subtle, because the idea of what women can and cannot do, has been ingrained into us. And even though we talk of empowerment, still in our minds, we maintain that distinction. We would pooh-pooh a grown money saving his money into a piggy-bank, but to show a woman doing that is OK, because “women’s work is inconsequential”.

The idea that women can earn little, have little, is a strong image of disempowerment. The idea, that a woman prefers to put in her few coins into a home-grown piggy-bank, instead of walking upto a teller, or an ATM, fits right into that “homely”, not smart enough mindset. The idea that Radha, who’s empowering her daughters, is still stuck in a woman’s “homely” mould, saving up her pennies, because she can do no better, is a sop to patriarchal society, and takes away from the premise of the soap.

How to offend Indian sensibilities (reprise)

Written By: amodini - Jan• 17•08

Have you heard ? Muslim fundies have been offended yet again ! From Mid-day :

“The All India Ulema Council (AIUC), an umbrella organisation of Muslims, is ‘shocked’ that the Godrejs gave a warm welcome to Salman Rushdie in Mumbai last week.”

. . . .

“The AIUC has demanded an apology from Godrej chairman Adi Godrej yesterday, failing which they will boycott all Godrej products in India.”

Oh, yes ! How dare Ms. Godrej possibly invite to a private party, any person who could potentially offend any other person ? Hmm ? Hmmm ?

If you’d like a refresher course on the “art of offending Indian sensibilities”, do please read my earlier post, here.

Living at IKEA

Written By: amodini - Jan• 08•08

Anyone see this ? CNN reports :

“When Mark Malkoff thought about where he could stay while his New York City apartment was being fumigated for cockroaches, he quickly ruled out friends’ places (too small) and hotels (too expensive).

Instead, the comedian and filmmaker decided to move into an Ikea store in suburban New Jersey, where on Monday he unloaded two suitcases into a spacious bedroom at the store. “

Publicity is the name of the game. Starving comedian and IKEA decide to get some. Reminds me of that Tom Hanks movie, The Terminal, where he lived in an airport. Of course there the TVs and toilets worked.

Although I do love IKEA, and it’s spare, modern designs which work, I might add – take a look at this beauty of a very comfortable chair, their furniture does tend to fall apart rather quickly. My bed and dresser set – very good-looking – are actually composed of a few particle boards with wood veneers, lots of cardboard, and some very good engineering. Of course anything which is not solid, it-won’t-break, wood can’t take the strain after a couple of years.

But then again, on the flip-side, it’s cheap (very student-friendly) and amazingly easy to assemble. They provide you everything you need to assemble : screws, nails, screwdrivers etc. and their directions are what I’d call precise. When they say align A to B, and screw in Part #2 through pre-drilled hole in A and B, you can be very sure that pieces A and B will exist, and be labelled, Part #2 will be in a sealed plastic bag waiting for you, and the predrilled holes will align perfectly. The thing may not work until I’m 80, but hey, as far as engineering is considered, you’ve got to admire them.

The Holiday Season (and all it brings)

Written By: amodini - Jan• 07•08

One of my friends is going on a no alcohol and no meat diet from this year. It’s apparently already started. I’m not sure how long it’ll last.

Also, more and more of the folks I know are getting pretty sociable. And that’s not relative to me, since I’m not the most sociable cat in the alley, you know ? I mean sociable, as in sociable from lunch to dinner every weekend. They also need to party-hop, which means more than one party per night. These are folks with kids, so I’m not sure how they do it. Me, I have one social engagement one week, and I’m exhausted enough to last a month. Like if you go out being social every lunch and dinner, when exactly do you cook, clean, launder and all the rest of that good stuff ? When exactly do you get time for self, the significant other, the kids, and you’ll all together ?

Really, email is good enough. And then there’s the phone, if you must use it. And reading this post, am so glad I don’t SMS and don’t get SMSed back (Thank the Lord for small mercies).

This isn’t really a rant – it’s more of a post to say I’m all tuckered out from all the holiday season lunches and dinners, and the mountains of food which have deposited themselves on my tummy and the rest of my anatomy.

The Best and the Worst of 2007

Written By: amodini - Jan• 04•08

I’ve picked the best films of the year – THE TOP 10 COUNTDOWN 2007, and they are at my blog, here, and also at Planet Bollywood , here. Also see the picks of the other Planet Bollywood critics in the Spotlight Section.

And then I couldn’t help it – there were so many of them just begging for it, I also made a list of the 10 worst films of the year. They aren’t really THE worst. Thankfully I didn’t get to scrape the barrel, I haven’t even seen stuff like “Dhol” and “RGV ki Aag”, but still there were the others which deserved to be named. Go have a look !

Beginnings of a new year

Written By: amodini - Jan• 03•08

You hear reports of assault, and you hear them, and you hear them again. And your ears burn. It’s the oft-repeated story. Last New Year. Last year. This year. Next year. Every day of every year. Every second of every minute of every day of every year.

Minor things, they say. Harmless. After all, boys will be boys. And the girls, they were from California (not sure why that should matter). Short dress, they say. Her fault, they say. Shouldn’t she have known better ? Why go out at all ? Why not barricade yourself in a room ? Because you know, if you go outside, the prowling beasts might decide to get you.

The photographs of this assault splashed across the front pages, apparently. The criminals, they are gone. Lost, anonymous, part of a mob. One, who led the assault was wearing a blue shirt, apparently. How do you find a blue shirt in Mumbai ? Another is clearly seen in photos. And on this blog, I see a link where the Hindustan Times is calling for people to identify him.

What about the rest ? From the photographs, can anyone see the other attackers ? Is there a police sketch ? Is there a hunt for these men ? Are these photos broadcast on television stations and newspapers, asking people to help identify them ? Are these men even considered real criminals ? Is there a serious search out there to find the perpetrators of this crime, one that will make them quail at the thought of being found ?

If found, can we promise that these men will be punished publicly, flogged or worse ? Can we promise massive public humiliation for them ? Have their crimes tattooed on their foreheads ? Inform their friends and families of their heinous crime ? Because they will have fathers, mothers, sisters, wives and children probably. Quite possibly they will come from “respectable” families, live in “respectable” neighborhoods. Quite possibly, they will be “nice boys”, whose mothers if asked will nod their heads and assure us that “their” boy wouldn’t do such a thing. Everyday people, you brush across in the street, who were just “having a bit of fun”, by forcing themselves on another human being.

There is an FIR, after fighting over jurisdiction. A crime occurs, a crime which threatens the most basic of rights, that of human dignity, and there is a quibble over jurisdictions. The top cop of Mumbai dismisses the matter as “minor”. Wasn’t his daughter, was it ?

I read in the reports that the police is asking the victims to step forward, and help catch the criminals. Apparently the victims aren’t exactly ecstatic at the thought. I can imagine why. The law depends on the victim as the fulcrum to pivot it’s way towards ensuring justice, without making any assurances of safety or justice towards the victim herself. What illusions of safety can one harbor after being assaulted in a public place, by a mob of men ? One man could be insane, maybe two, but a mob ?

There are baser instincts, but acting on them is possible when you’re sure you’re going to get away with it. Indian men aren’t special, they just reside in a society which refuses to acknowledge or act upon crimes against women, the poor, or the weak.

I’m not sure though why this is just a crime against the two women (let’s for simplicity consider this specific case). This is a crime against society, and there needs to be provisions in the law to facilitate indictment of criminals when there is public proof. A crime caught on camera is nothing if not public proof. The state should be able to press charges without requiring assistance from the victims.

I am Legend

Written By: amodini - Dec• 31•07

I Am Legend (Full-Screen Edition)If there must be a last man on earth, I cannot imagine it being anyone else other than Will Smith. He plays one in this film, and does it beautifully. I say this because the story is a bit unusual, in the sense that mostly there is only one actor in the scene (save of course a dog and some unearthly blood-sucking creatures). To make the most of the film, with only one actor and yet hold interest is great work.

“I am Legend” falls into the sci-fi horror category. Smith plays Dr. Robert Neville and army scientist, alone in Manhattan after a man-made virus has struck and wiped out most of the earth’s population. The remaining have mutated into rabid, hairless, super-strong creatures which hide from daylight and hunt by night. Thus while Neville roams about fearless in the day-time he barricades himself up in his home at night. His lone companion is his dog.

Neville, also a scientist, is working his way towards a cure in the laboratory in the basement. However many attempts meet with failure, and his spirit broken, he foolhardily puts himself in danger one night . . .

When going in to watch this film, I had no idea that this was part horror. Thus, while it was amazing to see Manhattan empty and deserted, overrun with weeds, the rabid vampires were a total surprise. Yes, you know this guy is all alone, save for his pet dog, and he’s hunting deer in downtown Manhattan, and competing with a pride of lions for the food. Surprise, Surprise !

Then we discover he has a very well-appointed home, with cans of food, electronica, ammunition and a well-stocked laboratory. He also had a wife and daughter (that story unfolds in flashback). But at the back of your mind, you know this can’t be it. There’s got to be a bigger problem, and it’d better be more major than what you’ve already seen, yeah ? Because he seems to be coping all right with his solitude – he works out everyday, and amazingly keeps body and mind intact. So when his dog rushes down this dark hallway in pursuit of a deer, and Neville is hesitant to go behind him (he does of course) you know that there is something IN THERE.

Will Smith does a bang-up job as Neville; he appears just as plausible as the last man on earth in deserted Manhattan, or as a scientist amid chaos battling to save the lives of humanity. His ability to emote, carry off wry humor, and appear to have the intelligence, physical strength, and the wits to keep himself alive in a weird and bizarre situation, help him no end in this role.

“I am legend” is based off of a 1954 novel by Richard Matheson and it works well, save for a few minor holes in the story. It’s very easy to imagine, while watching this film, how easy it would be for humanity to kill itself off. A good entertainer and well worth the watch.