Amodini's Book Reviews

Book Reviews and Recommendations

Music on my jukebox

Written By: amodini - Nov• 30•07

Lots of new films coming up, and lots of new music too. Johhny Gaddar has 2 very good numbers, my favorite being the title track “Johnny Gaddar”. The other number by Hard Kaur is also very good. Then there is “Jab we met” and it’s peppy music. I really like “Yeh Ishq hai”, although it seems a little jaded – the beats seem very familiar and Ilayaraja-ish. “Nagada, nagada” is an out and out Bhangra dance number, which gets me on my feet every time. And so is “Mauja, mauja”. The music of “Om Shanti Om” on the whole was OK – better with visuals, except one – “Aankhon mein teri” which is a beautiful, melodious number. A little older, but still great for a work-out is the title track of “Cash”.

Happy listening !

A bunch of links

Written By: amodini - Nov• 15•07

Nowdays I’m kinda slow on the writing but fast on the reading. So here are some links. First, an excellent article by Tavleen Singh : An incomplete tryst with democracy. Next an article on eve-teasing and harassment from India Together : Fighting Eve-teasing. Thirdly, an article by Kalpana Sharma for the Hindu (also posted on India Together) : The invisible half. And lastly, a very nice post by The Most Interesting Waiter in the World : The first cold day – what we wish the world would be, and what it is, no ?

Shahrukh’s Un-Makeover

Written By: amodini - Oct• 29•07

before_after

Let’s face it – SRK’s not a real handsome man. Sure, he has charisma oozing from every possible pore, but handsome – no I don’t think so. Now, with all the hype from OSO comes his 6-pack chest, which Farah reveals at every possible opportunity in the film. I mean 6 packs are good and all, but what’s he done to his face ? What’s with the new haircut – didn’t anyone tell him it makes him look the swan who went back to being the ugly duckling ? Like someone said to me the other day, if you could look at him from only the neck downwards, all would be well with the world

The last bastion

Written By: amodini - Oct• 15•07

housework

The New York Times has a pretty interesting article talking about a survey on happiness. It’s titled “He’s happier, she’s less so” and says :

“. . .there appears to be a growing happiness gap between men and women.

Two new research papers, using very different methods, have both come to this conclusion. Betsey Stevenson and Justin Wolfers, economists at the University of Pennsylvania (and a couple), have looked at the traditional happiness data, in which people are simply asked how satisfied they are with their overall lives. In the early 1970s, women reported being slightly happier than men. Today, the two have switched places.”

And the reason ?

“Mr. Krueger, analyzing time-use studies over the last four decades, has found an even starker pattern. Since the 1960s, men have gradually cut back on activities they find unpleasant. They now work less and relax more.

Over the same span, women have replaced housework with paid work — and, as a result, are spending almost as much time doing things they don’t enjoy as in the past. Forty years ago, a typical woman spent about 23 hours a week in an activity considered unpleasant, or 40 more minutes than a typical man. Today, with men working less, the gap is 90 minutes. “

“What has changed — and what seems to be the most likely explanation for the happiness trends — is that women now have a much longer to-do list than they once did (including helping their aging parents). They can’t possibly get it all done, and many end up feeling as if they are somehow falling short.”

So what it boils down to is women are less happier than men. And I agree with the reason too. Women do have longer to-do lists. My husband disagrees – he thinks his to-do list is bigger than mine. So we are equal sort of – I think the work in our household is split 60-40, with me doing the 60%. My husband agrees about the 60-40, but thinks he’s doing the 60%. We both think we are over-worked. Hmphh ! So much for equality !

I have long considered the “Super-Woman” or “Super-Mom” deal a myth – a big, fat, blubbery myth. A Super-Woman would be vastly over-worked. Life as a normal woman is so much better. You get to have good days and bad days, and you get to have times when you can’t get everything done and it’s OK. Plus you don’t have to be a perfectionist.

I also do think that women think about minutiae much more, and worry much more. Behind every thing I do for my kids, there goes a lot of thought. Take clothes for example : I buy clothes, I consider size, pattern, style, fit, comfort, washability, how soon it will outgrow, kid’s favorite characters on the clothes, or their favorite colors. It takes time and considerable effort. If my husband were to do the same clothes shopping he’d take half the time. Why ? He’d consider one thing – size ie; whether it fits (now) or not. He’d be in and out of the store buying the first thing that’d fit. Men don’t think (at times like this). Still waters in this case don’t run deep. They might look deep in thought, but ask them about it, and they’re probably only thinking of dinner or the upcoming cricket match.

And it’s not just my husband. My brother’s the same way. My Dad may be the most organized person when it comes to paperwork, but ask him to do something beyond his usual sphere of work, like boil water and he’ll probably forget the details – like switching the burner on and off. My brother-in-law, my neighbor, and in fact most men, so my friends tell me, are similarly afflicted. Not that we appreciate them any less; we just recognize the disease.

Ok, so why is this ? Why is choosing clothes for the kids such tedium ? Why is housework considered such anathema for most men ? Oh, God forbid that they come into the kitchen and ladle a dish or something ! The skies might come crashing down, the natural progression of the world might stop, or Oh My God !! – we might not have a decent Hindi film this year. Oh, forget about the last one – it already happened.

But, seriously have you ever see the social sanction this practice has ? I’ve seen my Mom and Mom-in-law talk to the guys like they would turn into disabled chickens if they walked into the kitchen. Like you want a glass of water – I’ll get it for you. Or better yet – Amodini will. He gets the smile, I get the look that says “Up woman ! Doncha know your place ? It’s in the kitchen, and in your spare time, at the feet of any available male”. You want food ? What’s your favorite dish ? Let me fetch, cut, clean, cook and serve that for you, here where you sit. No need to move a muscle. And then looking at me – You, come help me.

My husband bathes the kids at my Mom’s place, and my parents are in raptures – like look at that considerate, unselfish, valiant young man going above and beyond the call of duty. My husband changes one kiddie diaper at my in-law’s place, and the entire family is dumb-struck. Men can do that ? Hmm, we always thought that they had this thumb condition, which prevented them from taping back the Huggies.

As a kid, the whole kitchen thing was apparently my thing. At least until I protested, and sought equality – the brother had better cut the salad too. My mother would trot out her reasons and do her best to quell me with “the look”, until my Dad came along and stayed firmly at my side. Reason won. Still, my Dad isn’t always there, and one gets the full blast of “expected womanliness” sans logic. As a girl I am expected to notice things. What don’t see the cushions at that unseemly angle ? Place them right. What, can’t smell the sabzi burning. (No, I couldn’t but I had a cold). Can’t guess the recipe just by looking at the dish – you blot on womanhood !

I sort of can’t blame the guys going around thinking they hold the world’s weight on their shoulders. Like if someone told me that all that was expected of me was to sit around, read the paper and order the food – you think I wouldn’t do it ? That if every once in a while when I used my two legs and two hands to fetch and carry, people would give me admiring glances, and stand around and applaud, I wouldn’t preen ? And if I took the afternoon off from my work to take the kid to the doctor’s , the office folk would look at me with awe and I’d become the poster-boy for ideal father-hood, and I wouldn’t see my own greatness ? Yeah, right !

Household work is unpaid and looked down upon. Household work constitutes what has been famously termed the second shift and can consist of cooking, cleaning, dusting, fetching, carrying, and being the general dogsbody when no-one else is available (which means always). It can also entail keeping lists in your head, remembering the names, birthdates and other assorted facts of about a 1000 or “close” family, and coordinating lives, clothes, Halloween costumes , pujas (desi ya know ?), basketball matches and birthday gifts.

So what’s with the work ? How come we have such long to-do lists ? As a desi woman some of it I think is traditionally foisted upon us – I am constantly told to take care of the family and household , feed the children well so they grow up strong etc, look after the hubby etc. No one’s telling the husband to “look after” me ! Years of “girlie” upbringing ie; reminded to be nurturing, deferential, respectful, solicitous, hard-working and the assumption that you will have a home-made career in the kitchen, whether you have anything else or not, takes it’s toll.

Lots of the work is also self-inflicted. I have friends who assure me that their kitchen must be absolutely clean before they retire for the night. And who’s cleaning it ? Not their better halves for sure. And guess who’s worrying about an unclean kitchen when you aren’t able to clean it one night? I think women do most of the work, primarily because the male partner won’t do it. And yes I have heard that they will help if asked, but please do you have to be asked ? The dishes won’t clean themselves. The clothes on the floor won’t hang themselves. You wish, yeah, but it ain’t happening.

The second reason is because women assume that if they won’t do it, it won’t get done. Or maybe work is just there to be done, and they can’t stand to see the sight of a messy closet or dishes or whatever, until the husband has cleaned up. It might be the case that the work does not get done until you do it, but it might be worthwhile to ask (again) first.

A lot of the work in (desi) households is repetetive work, clean, cook, launder. Repeat. Clean, cook . . . Just the house-work of a small nuclear family can swallow you up. There are closets to clean, paperwork to sort, bed-linens to launder. Add to that a couple of kids who think it’s fun to finger-paint on spotlessly clean, newly spread, sparkling white bed-sheets, and . . . it does not end.

I used to be a very, very “clean” person. The kind of person, who when she folds her towels must have the corners align. I am also a big fan of symmetry, hence my coffee table must sit exactly in the center of the carpet, and the centerpiece on the table must sit exactly in the center of the table. When I slip off my slippers/shoes and place them in the closet, both shoes must be parallel to each other. You get the idea.

My husband (and most men) can come home from work, totally not see a sink full of dishes, and leave to work-out for an hour. I have long pondered the reasons for this selective blindness. How come you can see the food on the counter, but about 2 feet away can’t see the sink ? He says it’s because it’s not the time; like not the time to clean. It’s the time to work-out and when the time is right, ie; after the working-out, relaxing etc. he will see them and get to them. Which he does.

Now, me – totally different mind-set. I come in, aiming to work-out too, but forget about that when I see the state of the house. It’s like warning bells going off in my head – “Dirty dishes front and center! Location : your house!” I can see all mom-like creatures smile devilishly “Gotcha” they say. Two hours later, the dish-washer’s loaded, the washing-ups done, the mess cleared up. But the time for the work-out’s gone and I’m exhausted.

However with the years my tolerance to unwashed dishes and general melee has increased. Sticking to my part of the duties and not doing the work because it’s there, has helped. Now I can come in and ignore the dishes, the scattered pillows (apparently the kids having a pillow fight with my nice cushions !! (**fume ** **fume** **combust**) and the general chaos of a busy household mid-week and actually continue with what I was planning to do.

At times like these, I imagine myself in extremely slimming pink athletic apparel, with the flag held high, running through what seems to be streams of adoring crowds, but what apparently are the mom-like creatures I was speaking of earlier, shooting daggers with their eyes (the daggers miss of course). The day is sunny and bright, yet balmy – kind of California like. I run on un-heeded. In the back-ground plays “We are the champions”.

After the run, I’ll come back and do the dishes, if it is my assigned task.

The middle name tag

Written By: amodini - Oct• 08•07

OK, tagged by S. The rules are as follows :

1.You must list one fact that is somehow relevant to your life for each letter of your middle name.
2.If you don’t have a middle name, use the middle name you would have liked to have had.
3. At the end of your blog post, you need to choose one person for each letter of your middle name to tag.

Since I don’t have a middle name, will use “Amodini”.

A – Avid reader. So much to read, such little time ! I always check out more books than I can possibly read, at the library.

M – Motherhood – Despite all my thoughts on this, I find that it does indeed rock your world, and totally redefines your priorities and thoughts on happiness. It’s also much harder than it looks.

O – Oily skin – I have it, and was plagued by pimples etc. during teenage. Now that I’m in my 30’s the oiliness is going away, and I’ve been told that people with oily skin tend to wrinkle less – yay !

D – Detest name-droppers, people with put-on accents, and folks who wear branded clothing and then brag about it. Why not just wear it and keep shut ?

I – Introvert – I probably rate pretty high on the introvert-scale. Polite conversation aside, unless I know you well, or am passionate on the topic, may not speak at all. People are often taken aback when they discover I have a (fairly strong) voice. Email is such a boon. Social situations where you have to polite-talk leave me exhausted.

N – Night-owl. I am one. Much easier to stay up the night than to wake up bright and early.

I – Intuitive – sort of. I often pick up on vibes my husband is completely oblivious to. I pay attention to gestures, facial expressions and body language, and not just the spoken word. My initial impression of a person can be vastly different than that of my husband’s.

Not going by my name (I don’t know anyone who’s name starts with O – do you ?), will tag A Muser, Tarana, Carla and Raj.

MTV (for Desis) is back

Written By: amodini - Sep• 28•07

MTV Desi is back in Amrikan land. Only it’s not called MTV Desi anymore – it’s plain old MTV and me thinks being beamed straight from India. Which is fantastic because the songs are chronologically right and not from 1700 B.J. (Before Jeetendra) times. And there are plenty of them – Chitrahar forever ! The Indian music industry is definitely churning away. This does mean that we forego our fix of the International Desi scene (ie; no Juggy D or Josh) but it still has it’s plusses. Like it’s really nice to be able to see trailers for upcoming desi films, and new music releases. Kind of fills in the hole left by other Desi channels. This beam-from-India model seems viable to me; it’s got lots of ads and lots of different programming. Speaking of the ads has anyone seen the KFC “Finger lickin’ good” (Taste ko waste mat karo darling) ad ?

And programming wise MTVIndia’s got 5-6 VJ’s who do almost everything. There’s Anusha, RanVijay, the two Cyruses, Mia and Nikhil. Mia’s got this whole frail Nicole Kidman thing going, doing the Saturday Shuffle. Which is kind of attractive because she seems a little goofy and doesn’t seem to take herself very seriously. A whole persona of Mia exists – you can email her, drop by her Facebook account etc. A couple of days back caught Nikhil anchoring a request show where he seemed to be ensconced in this highly modern-looking pad – laptop and all. Nikhil who’s probably getting older (like the rest of us) is showing it. A paunch, tight T shirt, and tapering jeans really do not do much for an out-of-shape MTV VJ. Not ageing gracefully that one – maybe they could apply some of that crazy-sexy-cool on him.

Meanwhile am awaiting Roadies Season 5 which kicks off Oct. 12th, and biding my time watching “Ranvir Vinay aur kaun”.

Remembering 9/11 and other dates

Written By: amodini - Sep• 15•07

September 11th is marked on my kid’s school planner with a ribbon. A little printed red and blue ribbon near the date. And looking at it this past Tuesday I realize that it is that day, once again. We remember, and the world remembers with us. Memorial services are held, one of which I see on NDTV. Bush and Cheney and their wives in dark colored suits, walking arm-in-arm solemnly, slowly on TV. 9/11 is forever branded in our brains, seared into our memories. As it should.

Living this far away from India, and getting news via the web and TV, it’s like news coming through a very narrow pipeline. Whatever makes it into the pipeline gets through. Since you aren’t there to experience it yourself, the news comes to via the media, filtered by media sense of what makes news and what does not. It’s very selective – this news getting. What’s on page one hits you, you don’t go scrabbling to read the little news articles on page five.

Thus I hear about bus accidents, train crashes, atrocities on a regular basis. 5 died here, 10 died there, 50 died there. A bus fell into a ravine in one village, backward class men (15 of them) were killed in another. I hear about it and I read about it and I wince. Another bus accident, another rail line not maintained ? So many people dead ? When I lived in India, such news (and it was there then too) didn’t sink in. Not sure what it was then.

And then I hear about worse. One bomb-blast, no two, no three ! One, two, three plane hijackings, many hostages. We look on, the government looks on. After the immediate horror of the incident dies down, we forget. Media forgets, this news gets pushed into the background. An year passes, and another and another. Yes, I hear a passing mention of an anniversary, but really who remembers ? How many died ? How many were hurt ? How did it happen ? Was the cause found, and if it was, was it corrected ?

Not many casualities, yeah ? After all, in a country of a billion, a couple of hundred die here and there, how does it matter (do wait, I’m not at 100% cycnicism yet) ? But count the 100 here and 50 there and 10 from another day last week, and you’ll get a huge number. And yes, I’ve heard all the clichés about third world lives being cheap, and the poor resources which make it impossible to prevent accidents and tragedies.

But maybe it’s not resources at all – maybe it is that we forget too soon. There is no 8/20 or 4/22 or 1/13 – no date seared into our brains, no disaster burned into our memories. Consequently there is little outrage, no outward symptom of the fact that we remember the grievous wrong, or the fact that we respected and loved those who died for no fault of their own. It’s not one life or a thousand, it must be enough that one life was lost needlessly.

Poetry mid-week

Written By: amodini - Sep• 13•07

It’s been a while since I blogged here. Now that I look at the date, more than a month. Ah, well ! You think you’ll write and you don’t. I see a nice post developing developing in my head, and somehow, never get down to putting it down in firm words. It just sort of drifts around in there, and withers away. Interesting way to see it that way – you know ? As in withering away, sloughed away, a little by little, by other stuff I must get to before I get to this.

Anyway, ever see the poetry in your life ? Yesterday, am driving into work, and the rain’s really coming down. On the freeway, visibility is so poor, I can barely make out the cars around me. And on the radio, the RJ begins to play Rod Stewart’s “Have you ever seen the rain ?”

Irony, poetry – whatever. Whatever way you choose to see it, that is.

Of ghar-jamai jokes and their side-effects

Written By: amodini - Aug• 07•07

Image courtesy xkcd.

My cousin Ashish is getting married. A love marriage to his non-Punjabi colleague . Both Ashish and Manisha are MBA grads. Working for MNCs in Delhi. Manisha’s family is very well-educated and progressive. Her Dad is no more and she and her Mom live in Delhi. Her married brother lives in Bangalore. Since Ashish is flat-sharing with a bunch of bachelors right now, chances are he’ll move in with Manisha and her Mom after the marriage. Manisha while a sweet-tempered girl, is no shrinking violet. Which means that if you ask her a question, you’ll get an answer. Which is good I think. However with the crowd back home, this is getting her the “badi tez hai” (clever – in a bad way) reviews. Imagine, a girl who actually says more than “Haanji” ! Plus people are sniggering over the fact that Ashish is all set to turn into a ghar-jamai, and move his suitcases into his mom-in-law’s house.

So reports my sis-in-law and she’s sniggering too. I don’t see the problem with his moving to wherever he chooses. All this ghar-jamai taunting because it’s his wife’s parents ? What if it had been Ashish’s mom instead of Manisha’s ? Then, it’d have been expected of Manisha (as a good bahu) to go live with her mom-in-law ! That’s what I tell my SIL. But she thinks it’s tradition. But don’t we want tradition to change ? And he’s not technically a ghar-jamai, I tell her – he’s not going to be sponging off them or anything. Yes, yes, I am told – but it’s all in good fun. Good fun ? I think not. I think it’s “fun” which causes a whole lot of bad damage. Not to Ashish or Manisha – they couldn’t care less. But to all of us who participate in this good fun, and take our cues on behavior and acceptability from this.

This “good fun” is subversive. Because what are we saying really when we snigger at Ashish ? That he’s a loser because he’s “listening” to his in-laws ? Why is a guy who thinks of his in-laws a loser, while a woman who does the same “a good bahu” ? We are essentially sending out a message that her parents have lower social strata than his, or however you choose to put it – they aren’t as important, their opinion don’t matter etc. And why ? Because they are HER parents, not his. Implied SON VALUE. Implied lesser value of daughter.

Further discussion with my SIL brought about a solution from her. After the marriage, Manisha’s Mom must leave Manisha with her new husband, and go live with her son in Bangalore. I didn’t see why. Because he’s the son, see ? I still don’t get it. Why, when Manisha is fully capable of supporting her Mom, should she go to her son ? Why must we not look upon daughters as being able ?

I am labeled a radical by family, and my Mom no less, when I bring up this implied value of women we project when we speak so carelessly and in so much “fun”. Do I want my daughter to listen to talk which implies lower esteem/respect just because of gender ? What are the young people learning when they hear us talk like this ? “Don’t cry like a girl” – how many times have you heard it ? Why are girls “supposed” to cry ?

As I was growing up, I would be harangued by the Mom and Aunties for not knowing how to cook, do laundry etc. – what would my in-laws say ? Is a woman’s self-worth all in her prospective in-laws praise ? As I question my Mom many years later, she says that that was in jest. Dangerous jest. I had my Dad to even out the score, but what of those girls perpetually steeped in such jests ?

This is the root cause of most social malaises plaguing women today. This carelessly worded, disempowering jest. This “good fun”. When we imply, however slightly, however jokingly, that women are lesser, by birth or gender, that they are weak just because of who they are , and who they are born as, we spread beliefs. This “fun” and it’s underlying value system, and the mind-set that girls and things relating to them are weaker, not worth opinion or care, gives rise to dowry, infanticide, foeticide, bride-burning, eve-teasing, domestic violence.

If a woman is lesser than a man, how can her sexuality be greater ? Tease her, molest her on the streets, for she must walk with downcast eyes (or else she must be uppity or a whore). A woman is born to serve, her parents, her in-laws, her children. Not servile enough ? Beat her. A woman is lesser – she must be married, we honor her family by marrying her. She must bring dowry, her parents, because they are her parents, must kow-tow to our demands. Not enough dowry ? Burn her. Then marry again, because they will be countless other families willing to sacrifice their burdensome daughters on the altar of tradition. When a daughter is born, moan. For she brings with her the burden of dowry. We will not educate her because what will she do with her education ? She cannot be our support in old-age because she will be married and not ours anymore, and tradition says to not depend on our daughters. So when a daughter is born, strangle her.

Once while having a talk with my Mom and Masi, we bemoaned the unchanging mindset of society. However when I pointed out to them that we were part of the problem they were horrified. I get the same reaction from other family. Everyone else but us causes the problem. It is apparently impossible to get into our thick heads, that just because we treat our daughters, daughters-in-laws, sisters and mothers right, we don’t do them any favors. We don’t exalt ourselves by treating women equally. We don’t achieve saint-hood just because our daughter-in-law has the freedom to express an opinion, or work (although it seems like it if you listen to people). We just make ourselves human.

It just amazes me that we know how we talk, we know how we think, yet when the aunty-next-door (in these oh-so-posh-flats-on-the-Bombay-seaside) verbally abuses her daughter-in-law, we wonder what kind of people these are. Really ? They are our kind of people.

Horrors – but no, the problem does not start with us. For after all, we only jest.

Happiness

Written By: amodini - Jul• 28•07

This gem by Jane Kenyon :

No, happiness is the uncle you never
knew about, who flies a single-engine plane
onto the grassy landing strip, hitchhikes
into town, and inquires at every door
until he finds you asleep midafternoon
as you so often are during the unmerciful
hours of your despair.

Entire poem here .

Via a link from India Uncut.